I had a request for chequering a hammer by a friend armourer . He was restoring a German shotgun from the early 20th century with a broken spur on one hammer, and he welded a new one. The original left hammer had small squares 0,4mm large.
I do have two liners with 6 and 10 lines that are too close , so I had to grind one with two teeth at 0,4mm. I used my lathe for grinding it with accuracy . The diamond disc for grinding is mounted on the lathe chuck and the carbide graver is held on a special fixture with a micrometric screw for adjusting the depth of the grinding .
The geometry I was looking for is a double “onglette” , but after a few tries I couldn’t grind two onglettes so close : My diamond disc has a thickness of 0,6mm
I find another solution, grinding my double onglette at 0,8mm and cutting grooves forming squares of 0,8mm .
Then I cut another series of grooves with the same tool , cutting 4 squares( 0,4mm large) on the primary ones ….
I don’t know how the German engraver did it. With a single onglette is quite difficult to obtain a lot of parallel grooves and his job was quite neat with very deep cuts. Mine is on the left of course
I had to cut ant cut again many times and my grooves never come out as neat as his. The hammer is not flat , that increases difficulty ….
I found some examples on the web of G. Young chequering , and it seems he was using a single tool as all the grooves aren’t parallel.
http://rockislandauction.blogspot.com/2013/07/gustave-young-iconic-engraver.html
If you look closely to the engraving of the German shotgun you’ll see a parallel border with 2 lines , I measured it and they are distant of 0,4mmn the engraver has certainly used the same tool for cutting the fine parallel line.
How do you manage this kind of work ? Thank you for sharing some ideas here .
I do have two liners with 6 and 10 lines that are too close , so I had to grind one with two teeth at 0,4mm. I used my lathe for grinding it with accuracy . The diamond disc for grinding is mounted on the lathe chuck and the carbide graver is held on a special fixture with a micrometric screw for adjusting the depth of the grinding .
The geometry I was looking for is a double “onglette” , but after a few tries I couldn’t grind two onglettes so close : My diamond disc has a thickness of 0,6mm
I find another solution, grinding my double onglette at 0,8mm and cutting grooves forming squares of 0,8mm .
Then I cut another series of grooves with the same tool , cutting 4 squares( 0,4mm large) on the primary ones ….
I don’t know how the German engraver did it. With a single onglette is quite difficult to obtain a lot of parallel grooves and his job was quite neat with very deep cuts. Mine is on the left of course
I had to cut ant cut again many times and my grooves never come out as neat as his. The hammer is not flat , that increases difficulty ….
I found some examples on the web of G. Young chequering , and it seems he was using a single tool as all the grooves aren’t parallel.
http://rockislandauction.blogspot.com/2013/07/gustave-young-iconic-engraver.html
If you look closely to the engraving of the German shotgun you’ll see a parallel border with 2 lines , I measured it and they are distant of 0,4mmn the engraver has certainly used the same tool for cutting the fine parallel line.
How do you manage this kind of work ? Thank you for sharing some ideas here .
Last edited: