Photography on cheap

vilts

Elite Cafe Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2007
Messages
512
Location
Estonia
Maybe it's useful to someone. One more way to do "studio" photography at home with very little resources, but quite decent results.

Sexy and naked model this time is my engraved Zippo.

What you need:
  1. Camera with flash
  2. One or more stand-alone flashes
  3. Slave flash trigger for these flashes

Now this setup is somewhat picky about flash on camera - what you need is a camera-flash combination that flashes only once. So TTL, E-TTL, red-eye reduction and full automatic cameras are unfortunately out, they do some pre-flashes to measure light and other stuff. This pre-flash tricks the slave trigger and makes stand-alone flashes to fire before it's needed. On my Canon Speedlite I set the mode to Manual and it did the trick.

Stand-alone flash can be basically any flash you can get your hands on. I used one old cheapo flash that I had lying around, it's worth probably no more than $10-15. Would be nice if you could adjust the flash power, but not necessarily - add paper sheet or 2 and you can reduce the flash power. eBay for Vivitar 283, Vivitar 285, Nikon SB-24's and probably many others.

Flash slave triggers are little neat thingies that you attach to your stand-alone flash and they will give sync signal when other firing flash is detected. Search on eBay for them, I got new one for $10 and works like a charm. They work even when shutter speed is 1/1000.

As you can see from my 'studio setup' photo, that on-camera flash is turned away so it doesn't light the scene. It is only used to trigger the slave units. I set my on-camera flash power to 1/128th and it triggered even then.

After that all you need to do is set the slaves as needed and shoot away.

Oh, one more flash tip of balancing flash and ambient lights. Flash brightness is determined only by aperture, ambient light is determined with combination of aperture and shutter speed. So if you look at the Zippo photo then the background is very dark, to achieve this I just set the shutter speed so fast that ambient light didn't register and aperture was set according to flash. Simple as that.

Equipment I used:
  1. Canon EOS 5D with Canon 100/2.8 macro lens
  2. Canon EX580 flash - only for triggering slave flash
  3. Unomat el Cheapo flash, as slave
  4. Flash trigger for slave
  5. Nokia 6310i phone for paperweight - works very well

And for your viewing pleasure, here's full size photo of that engraved Zippo - feel free to zoom in and see every slip I made there...

Actually on the right side of Zippo I held a paper sheet to fill in little bit this darker side, if you look closely then you can see it. The sheet of tracing paper in front of slave flash is just to diffuse the light a little.

Don't hesitate to ask if anything is unclear.

Viljo
 

Attachments

  • studio.jpg
    studio.jpg
    86.2 KB · Views: 97
  • flash_setup.jpg
    flash_setup.jpg
    75.6 KB · Views: 79
  • IMG_5941.jpg
    IMG_5941.jpg
    119.7 KB · Views: 156
Last edited:

KCSteve

~ Elite 1000 Member ~
Joined
Jun 19, 2007
Messages
2,882
Location
Kansas City, MO
Nice post Vilts!

One advantage of my Minolta gear - it has wireless flash capability built in.
I just need to get some time to work so I can get something done that's worth taking the time to photograph this well.
 

nomentalgiant

Elite Cafe Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2007
Messages
105
Location
New Orleans, Louisiana
Vilts,
Thanks for taking the time to post. I don't know much about photography so excuse me if this question is completely ignorant, but I was wondering what is the advantage of using flash in place of shining a light on the subject? Thanks for the help.

P.S. Nice work on the lighter!
 

KCSteve

~ Elite 1000 Member ~
Joined
Jun 19, 2007
Messages
2,882
Location
Kansas City, MO
James,

One reason to use flash is because it's the right color. Very few lights match daylight properly. Most of the ones that do are extremely bright and very hot. Electronic flashes are made to give light that 'looks right' on film (or digital sensor).

There's also the issue of really bright lights tending to be really hot lights (as noted) which isn't as much of a problem when the light is only on for a fraction of a second.
 

Sam

Chief Administrator & Benevolent Dictator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 6, 2006
Messages
10,491
Location
Covington, Louisiana
I never use flash when doing this type of photography. For me, what-you-see-is-what-you-get lighting produces the best and most consistant results. Also, incorrect white balance is an easy fix in Photoshop, especially when shooting raw.
 

vilts

Elite Cafe Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2007
Messages
512
Location
Estonia
James, about flash vs. regular light. I believe it's also question of how you're used to work and what equipment you have. I just happen to need those extra flashes for my other photo work and now use them to shoot engravings too. Sunlight or just lamps work too.

Actually some time ago I had to make that decision - to go either for lamps or flashes. I chose flashes, because they're more useful to me. I can adjust their power as needed, carry 'em around, do location shoots etc.

But again, as with many things and especially with different tools, it's the man behind the tool that counts, not the tool itself.
 
Top