TONY ANTON
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2021
- Messages
- 4
I'm not an engraver but i enjoy reading this forum. I have a question to ask and that is what is the better quality of engraving performed by hand hammer or the use of air assist tool ?
air assist would, in my hand, be much faster than h&c. i'd guess most that have used both ways would probably agree. the writing is on the wall. john rohner started a revolution that changed the way most engravers work. for me there's no reason to go back. i've only set a couple of stones but i'd sooner use air than the older methods. i can't imagine me doing stone setting the way you folks do. it would drive me nuts !After a lifelong use of an air-assist tool in setting stones. I would be less productive and less determined if I show up tomorrow to work using only conventional tools. I might even retire. So I think I will keep my original Gravermax unless I get a pulsegraver which I believe is the best versatile power tool for stone setting. Winston.
i never had the pulse graver so don't know. i will say the gravermeister and lindsay air assist would be hard pressed to do this.The Pulse Graver may be the only one that can be slow enough to mimic H&C.
I have a very old NgraveR shaft drive handpiece and it replicates H&C very well.The Pulse Graver may be the only one that can be slow enough to mimic H&C.