dlilazteca
~ Elite 1000 Member ~
Good one DOC!The one on the left is what you want for "draw filing". The one on the right is a real b-a-s-t-a-r-d!
View attachment 31636
Saludos,
Carlos
www.GunEngraver.com
Good one DOC!The one on the left is what you want for "draw filing". The one on the right is a real b-a-s-t-a-r-d!
View attachment 31636
only on the action not the other parts.Isn't illegal to remove the manufacturer's name?
As I have no expertise in this matter, I am willing to admit I am puzzled. I wonder if this may be true only for firearms manufactured in 1968 or later, as the Gun Control Act of 1968 is the first incidence that I have seen of the requirement that the name of the manufacturer be on the firearm.
The earlier requirement contained in the INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1954, PART II, CH. 53, Subchapter B, SEC. 5843. IDENTIFICATION OF FIREARMS required only that each manufacturer and importer of a firearm shall identify the firearm by a number or an identification mark approved by the Secretary of the Treasury or his delegate.
Have I missed something that occurred between 1954 and 1968, or have I missed the point altogether?
As I have no expertise in this matter, I am willing to admit I am puzzled. I wonder if this may be true only for firearms manufactured in 1968 or later, as the Gun Control Act of 1968 is the first incidence that I have seen of the requirement that the name of the manufacturer be on the firearm.
The earlier requirement contained in the INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1954, PART II, CH. 53, Subchapter B, SEC. 5843. IDENTIFICATION OF FIREARMS required only that each manufacturer and importer of a firearm shall identify the firearm by a number or an identification mark approved by the Secretary of the Treasury or his delegate.
Have I missed something that occurred between 1954 and 1968, or have I missed the point altogether?