Thank you very much. You gave me exactly the answer I needed. I am a jeweler by profession, but I like to sometimes do engraving on the jewelry I make. Some engravings are simple (some initials) and sometimes I engrave pendants with more complex engravings...currently under the hood of my glasses, which is quite stressful for me. If I ever have more work as an engraver, I will buy a better microscope.I have. I bought one because they're cheap enough to roll the dice on, I think and it will pleasantly surprise you. "Quite good" is probably an apt description.
I've used Meiji EMZ-5, had an older Omano (now Amscope I think), and use a Leica A60 at school, and while the Vevor isn't quite as nice as those, it's really surprisingly good. C
If you've been doing stonesetting without a scope, your world is gonna be totally rocked with one. You think your work was clean. You will see that it wasn't. Thought you filed that prong smooth? Nope! You think you got a good polish. You will see that you didn't. Welcome to the dark side.Thank you very much. You gave me exactly the answer I needed. I am a jeweler by profession, but I like to sometimes do engraving on the jewelry I make. Some engravings are simple (some initials) and sometimes I engrave pendants with more complex engravings...currently under the hood of my glasses, which is quite stressful for me. If I ever have more work as an engraver, I will buy a better microscope.
I agree with this statement wholeheartedly, but I also recall a lot of conversations with my fellow community college engraving classmates who loved the class but found the startup costs to do it with their own equipment so prohibitive that they never engraved again. If the affordable price of a "good enough" $287.00 Vevor scope is what keeps them engraving and practicing, that's worth the downgrade in quality in the short term. If they put in the effort it takes to outgrow the cheap scope, by that point the $3k expenditure for a Leica starts to make a lot more sense. To extend the eyeglasses metaphor, you certainly don't want to skimp on quality. However, there's a time in life (for me, right now!) to buy grocery-store readers if that's all you need in your situation, until your situation requires a prescription.Your eyes can overcome optical defects in a microscope without you knowing it, and after hours of use you may develop headaches and eye strain and not know why. My eyes deserve the best optics I can afford, and I wouldn't buy cheap eyeglasses knowing they are less clear and sharp. Just my 2 cents.
That is exactly the question of the current situation... should I buy Vevor and start working or wait until I spend 2000-3000$ and buy the real thing. And what if it doesn't happen that I don't collect that money for the microscope in the next 3 years? Have I progressed or regressed? Rather, it will happen that $300 will earn much more expensive and better, and I learned a lot in the process...and I will not suffer with longing watching a video on YT of how some masters there are enjoying themselves.I agree with this statement wholeheartedly, but I also recall a lot of conversations with my fellow community college engraving classmates who loved the class but found the startup costs to do it with their own equipment so prohibitive that they never engraved again. If the affordable price of a "good enough" $287.00 Vevor scope is what keeps them engraving and practicing, that's worth the downgrade in quality in the short term. If they put in the effort it takes to outgrow the cheap scope, by that point the $3k expenditure for a Leica starts to make a lot more sense. To extend the eyeglasses metaphor, you certainly don't want to skimp on quality. However, there's a time in life (for me, right now!) to buy grocery-store readers if that's all you need in your situation, until your situation requires a prescription.
I'm finally at the point in life where I can afford the "buy once, cry once" price tag, but I also built my knifemaking shop/brand/reputation starting with $300 and never spending more on new equipment than I made from the hobby for the first 12 years I did it. I've always bought the best equipment I could afford at the time I needed it so that I could keep working, but that was never the best equipment available until literally 3 months ago, 15 years into the craft. Has that cost-neutral strategy held back advancement in my craft? Yeah, a little, but it kept me in the game when I otherwise would have been forced to drop out. It also let me keep the hobby fun, since I never felt like I HAD to work on uninteresting projects in order to justify all the money I'd spent on the best equipment. And that has also been important to keeping me in the game.