Heel sharpening question

Crazy Horse

Elite Cafe Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2006
Messages
587
Location
Philly
Number #1 would be better suited to hand push and chisel and hammer engraving, whereas #2 is best for air assist engraving.
 

jerrywh

~ Elite 1000 Member ~
Joined
Jun 7, 2007
Messages
1,032
Location
Baker City , Oregon
I have used both types on almost everything. The only difference I could determine was if you go too deep with the conventional or #1 type you cannot come out of the cut. When using the number 2 type or parrallel heel it doesn't matter how deep you go. The graver won't dive on you. But the extra time involved in sharpening isn't worth the effort to me. Both cut around corners the same if you lean them some to the outside of the curve. In my opinion if you can't come out of the cut with the #1 type your cutting too deep. Most beginners tend t ocut too deep
 

Roger Bleile

~ Elite 1000 Member ~
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
2,993
Location
Northern Kentucky
In my experience, #2 will leave less or no burr, especially on deeper cuts. Another advantage of #2 is that you can heavily flare a cut using a square graver that would normally require a flat graver.
 
Last edited:

monk

Moderator
Staff member
::::Pledge Member::::
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
10,962
Location
washington, pa
#2. the shorter the heel, the better for tight curves. i never measured, just eyeballed. sam alfano advised not much wider than a human hair. btw, don't know how a bald guy used a hair as a guide. where did he get one ??
 

sam

Chief Administrator & Benevolent Dictator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 6, 2006
Messages
10,526
Location
Covington, Louisiana
I engraved with a 90° #1 for 25 years.
I started with #2 when GRS introduced their EasyGraver fixture, which I wanted the speed and convenience of. I can engrave equally well with either geometry but as Roger pointed out, #2 is well suited for flare cuts.
 

Latest posts

Sponsors

FEGA
Top